Showing posts with label Complex regional pain syndrome. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Complex regional pain syndrome. Show all posts

Saturday, April 19, 2014

Complex regional pain syndrome-like symptoms during herpes zoster

Abstract

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) associated with herpes zoster (HZ) was first reported by Sudeck in 1901 (Sudeck, 1901) and is recognized clinically. However, only 13 cases have been published in the literature, and nothing is known about the incidence, prevalence, or natural history (Chester, 1992; Foster et al., 1989; Grosslight et al., 1986; Ketz and Schliack,1968; Kishimoto et al., 1995; Querol and Cisneros, 2001;Sudeck, 1901; Visitsunthorn and Prete, 1981). The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of CRPS-like symptoms in a prospectively gathered cohort of subjects with HZ and to follow the natural history of their pain and sensory disturbance during the first 6 months after onset of HZ. Subjects were evaluated at four time points after HZ: 2-6 weeks, 6-8 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Only subjects aged 50 or older with pain VAS ratings of >/=20/100 at 2-6 weeks were eligible. The first (screening) visit included a neurological and physical examination that was updated at each subsequent visit. Assessments included ratings of pain intensity, allodynia severity, and rash severity. The neurological exam included determination of presence or absence of the following CRPS-like symptoms: (1) increased sweating, (2) color changes, (3) skin temperature changes, (4) weakness of the affected area based on physical exam, (5) edema, and (6) extension of CRPS-like symptoms outside the affected dermatome. For subjects with HZ in dermatomes that can include the limbs (C4-T2 and L1-S2), extremity involvement was considered present if allodynia or rash extended beyond the neck of the humerus (upper extremity), the inguinal ligament (anterior lower extremity), or gluteal sulcus (posterior lower extremity). Involvement of the extremity was considered proximal if neither HZ rash nor allodynia extended past the elbow (upper extremity) or knee (lower extremity). Of the first 75 subjects recruited, 25 had HZ outbreaks in dermatomes that extended into the extremities (C4-T2 and L1-S2). In this group, 8 subjects had no extremity involvement, 8 had proximal extremity involvement, and 9 had distal extremity involvement. Subjects with distal extremity HZ reported more pain across the four visits (p < 0.05). At 3 months, more subjects with distal extremity involvement met criteria for PHN (8 out of 9, 89%), while only 4 out of 8 (50%) with proximal involvement and 2 out of 8 (25%) of subjects without extremity involvement met criteria for PHN (Chi-square test: p < 0.05). Only 25 out of the remaining 50 (50%) subjects with outbreaks in dermatomes that do not include the extremities met criteria for PHN at 3 months (Chi-square test: p < 0.05). Six months after onset of HZ, 6 out of 9 subjects with distal extremity involvement met PHN criteria compared with 2 out of 8 (25%) with proximal involvement and 2 out of 8 (25%) without extremity involvement (Chi-square test: p = 0.12). Fifteen out of 50 (30%) subjects with outbreaks in dermatomes that do not include the extremities met criteria for PHN (Chi-square test: p < 0.05). No subject had all six CRPS-like symptoms. Of the 17 subjects with extremity involvement, 9 subjects had '0-2 CRPS-like symptoms' and 8 had '3-5 CRPS-like symptoms'. None of the eight subjects without extremity involvement had any CRPS-like symptoms. Of the 50 subjects with HZ outside the extremity, only one had abdominal weakness. Pain ratings were higher in subjects with '3-5 CRPS-like symptoms'. More subjects with '3-5 CRPS-like symptoms' met criteria for PHN at 3 months (7 out of 8, 88%), compared to 5 out of 9 (55%) of subjects with '0-2 CRPS-like symptoms' (p = 0.07). At 6 months, 2 out of 9 (22%) of subjects with '0-2 CRPS-like symptoms' met criteria for PHN, compared with 6 out of 8 (75%) of subjects with '3-5 CRPS-like symptoms' (Chi-square test: p < 0.03). Two case-reports are presented. In summary, the occurrence of CRPS-like symptoms is common in subjects with HZ outbreaks affecting the extremity, particularly if the distal extremity is involved. It is uncertain if the pathophysiology underlying the CRPS-like symptoms observed in this study is similar to that of CRPS from other causes, or if it is relatively specific to HZ. Development of PHN is common in subjects who have experienced CRPS-like symptoms. More aggressive preventive treatments may be justified in this high-risk subset of HZ subjects to prevent development of PHN. Prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to determine which subjects are most likely to benefit and when treatment should begin.
PMID:
 
15275746
 
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Complex regional pain syndrome versus chronic regional pain syndrome (Hand-Finger Syndrome)

Abstract

Dystrophy is a main factor of CRPS. A large number of patients do not develop dystrophy but, instead, they suffer from pain with limitation in movement, possible paraesthesia and/or swelling. This is then a chronic regional pain syndrome or (shoulder-arm-) hand-finger syndrome. These patients should never be confronted with the diagnosis Morbus Sudeck or algodystrophy, which are today also well known among non-professionals, to avoid pushing them into a status of constant severe invalidity. Histories, clinical examination, as well as a good personal understanding of the patient are indispensable. Knowing that pain, or the extent of pain, remains subjective until today, the clinical diagnosis depends on the absence of side differences in: a) the circumference of soft tissues of both upper extremities; b) the callosity of the palm; c) the bone-density. These three parameters allow verification of the consequences of the pain complaints (indirect pain verification). It is essential to find the cause for their suffering and to treat it as far as possible: 1) Too long and inappropriate immobilisation (patient's suffering not considered sufficiently). These patients can recover quickly when the right diagnosis is made in good time. 2) Limitation of movement due to scar, neuroma, or elongation pain: a) bizarre functional disabilities can develop; b) due to the patient's complaints, one or several operations would finally be performed, which will not lead to an improvement but rather to an aggravation of the pain; c) socially-induced purposeful pain increase, the typical statement of the patient will be: "I can't stand it any longer". Patients who are socially over-burdened, or have psycho-social problems, may experience a decline of performance or a post-traumatic stress disorder. Several patients will be introduced as illustrations for each of the relevant groups.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart, New York.
PMID:
 
20205065
 
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Complex regional pain syndrome acceptance and the alternative denominations in the medical literature.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To analyze the use of the term 'complex regional pain syndrome' in the medical literature and evaluate whether or not the traditional names 'reflex sympathetic dystrophy' and 'causalgia' have already been replaced with the new terms 'complex regional pain syndrome type I' and 'complex regional pain syndrometype II', respectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

The Scopus and PubMed databases were searched for reports written between 2001 and 2012 for the following descriptors in the titles: 'complex regional pain syndrome', 'complex regional pain syndrome type I', 'complex regional pain syndrome type 1', 'complex regional pain syndrome type II', 'complex regional pain syndrome type 2', 'CRPS', 'CRPS type I', 'CRPS type 1', 'CRPS type II', 'CRPS type 2', 'reflex sympathetic dystrophy', 'algodystrophy', 'algoneurodystrophy', 'causalgia', 'transient osteoporosis', 'Sudeck', and 'shoulder-hand syndrome'.

RESULTS:

Systematization of the 1,318 articles found yielded the following: 953 (72.31%) articles for the descriptor 'complex regional pain syndrome' and a further 94 (7.13%) for its abbreviation 'CRPS'; 180 (13.66%) for 'reflex sympathetic dystrophy'; 33 (2.50%) for 'shoulder-hand syndrome'; 29 (2.20%) for 'algodystrophy'; 13 (0.99%) for 'causalgia'; 13 (0.99%) for 'Sudeck'; 2 (0.15%) for 'algoneurodystrophy', and 1 (0.08%) for 'transient osteoporosis'. The total number of articles using new terminology represents 1,047 (79.44%) of all articles.

CONCLUSION:

The new neutral term 'complex regional pain syndrome' was most commonly used and will likely replace the traditional names 'reflex sympathetic dystrophy' and 'causalgia'. The new terminology is now widely accepted by the medical professionals who are mostly engaged in the treatment of CRPS patients, but not yet so in other medical spheres.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.
PMID:
 
23171669
 
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]